Rose v. Connelly
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the CourtClark, Circuit Judge
(sitting as District Judge pursuant to statutory designation) .
The claim of plagiarism herein seems to me quite fantastic. The two plays differ in plot, in character interest, in background, in general purpose and intent — in short, in substantially all points of reader or theatre interest. Plaintiff’s lugubrious drama has a somewhat pretentious, though not unified, story. First we find the heroine and her employer in his business office arranging a mutual seduction; next we find her as mistress of his home, where he dies suddenly as his wife returns. Then in the second act the scene shifts…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lewys v. O'NEILLDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
- Lowenfels v. NathanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1932
3Cited by13 opinions
- Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation v. McA Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Cloth v. HymanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Christie v. HarrisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1942
- Malkin v. DubinskyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Olson v. National Broadcasting Co. Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.