Legal Opinion

Rose v. Connelly

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 5, 1941PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, Circuit Judge

(sitting as District Judge pursuant to statutory designation) .

The claim of plagiarism herein seems to me quite fantastic. The two plays differ in plot, in character interest, in background, in general purpose and intent — in short, in substantially all points of reader or theatre interest. Plaintiff’s lugubrious drama has a somewhat pretentious, though not unified, story. First we find the heroine and her employer in his business office arranging a mutual seduction; next we find her as mistress of his home, where he dies suddenly as his wife returns. Then in the second act the scene shifts…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lewys v. O'NEILLDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
  2. Lowenfels v. NathanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1932

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation v. McA Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  2. Cloth v. HymanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
  3. Christie v. HarrisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1942
  4. Malkin v. DubinskyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
  5. Olson v. National Broadcasting Co. Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API