Legal Opinion
Waronker v. Hempstead Union Free School District
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided October 17, 2019No. 19-407Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
19-407 Waronker v. Hempstead Union Free School District UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007 IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- William Hayden v. County of Nassau, United States of America and Nassau County Guardians Association, Defendants-Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Denney v. Deutsche Bank AGCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Panther Partners Inc. v. Ikanos Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Segal v. City Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.