Legal Opinion

Krauskopf v. Perales

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 7, 1988PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Mikoll, J.

Petitioners are challenging the promulgation by respondent Commissioner of Social Services of an internal ruling of the Department of Social Services (hereinafter DSS) setting forth the standards for determining which individuals are mentally disabled for Medicaid reimbursement purposes; local governmental entities are entitled to 100% reimbursement from respondent State of New York for the care of mentally disabled individuals pursuant to Social Services Law § 368-a (as amended by L 1983, ch 816, § 1). Petitioners sought a declaration that the definition of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bernstein v. ToiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. MATTER OF ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF ALBANY v. New York State Dep't of HealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. People v. CullNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  4. Jones v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Connell v. ReganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. MTR SCHWARTFIGURE v. HartnettNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. County of Niagara v. DainesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. MATTER OF KRAUSKOPF v. PeralesNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. County of St. Lawrence v. ShahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. County of Niagara v. ShahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API