Legal Opinion
MATTER OF KRAUSKOPF v. Perales
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 30, 1989PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. .
We agree, for the reasons stated by Justice Ann T. Mikoll at the Appellate Division (139 AD2d 147), that the Department of Social Services did not violate procedural requirements in adopting a definition of "mental disability” for the purpose of reimbursement eligibility pursuant to Social Services Law § 368-a; and that the definition adopted by the Department of Social Services is neither irrational nor arbitrary.
Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr.,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Krauskopf v. PeralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3Cited by14 opinions
- MTR SCHWARTFIGURE v. HartnettNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- County of Niagara v. DainesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- County of St. Lawrence v. ShahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- County of Niagara v. ShahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Spano v. NovelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.