In Re Pollitz
Supreme Court of the United States
PETITION POR WRIT OP MANDAMUS. James Pollitz, a citizen of the State of' New York, brought suit in the . Supreme Court of the State of New York for the county of New York against the' Wabash Railroad Company, a, consolidated railroad corporation existing under the laws of the States of Ohio, Michigan, Illinois and Missouri' and a citizen of the State of Ohio; and sundry other defendants, chiefly citizens and residents of the State of New York,, being, individual directors of…
Read the full summary
PETITION POR WRIT OP MANDAMUS. James Pollitz, a citizen of the State of' New York, brought suit in the . Supreme Court of the State of New York for the county of New York against the' Wabash Railroad Company, a, consolidated railroad corporation existing under the laws of the States of Ohio, Michigan, Illinois and Missouri' and a citizen of the State of Ohio; and sundry other defendants, chiefly citizens and residents of the State of New York,, being, individual directors of the railroad company; the. "trust company, registrar of the stock of the railroad company; a committee representing…
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Chief Justice Fullee,
after making the foregoing statement, delivered-the opinion of the court.
The suit 'was commenced, in the .state court by a citizen and resident of the city, county and State of New York against a corporation, a citizen of the State' of Ohio, and other defendants, jnany of whom were residents and citizens of the State of New York, the value of the matter in dispute, exclusive of interest and costs, exceeding the jurisdictional sum.
The defendant, the Wabash. Railroad Company, a citizen of Ohio, filed its petition and bond in proper form for the removal of the suit into…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ex Parte WisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- In Re HohorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Hohorst v. Hamburg-American Packet Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Virginia v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Ex Parte HardingSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- In Re WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Ex Parte NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Ex Parte RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- In Re Metropolitan Trust Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.