Legal Opinion

BROPHY v. THE HARTLEY DOERING GROUP, INC.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 15, 2020No. 1:18-cv-02169Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA BRENDON BROPHY, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-02169 v. (KANE, J.) (MEHALCHICK, M.J.) THE HARTLEY DOERING GROUP, INC. d/b/a ROSSMOYNE ANIMAL EMERGENCY TRAUMA CENTER, Defendant. MEMORANDUM Before the Court is plaintiff Brendon Brophy’s motion to compel and for sanctions (Doc. 33) concerning his claim for damages under the Americans with Disability Act (ADA),

42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213, the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA),

29 U.S.C. §§ 2601-2654, and state law. (Doc. 1). Defendant is The Hartley Doering Group, Inc. d/b/a Rossmoyne…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Eric Esher Schmid v. Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation Eric SchmidCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  3. In Re Teleglobe Communications Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  4. Anderson v. Wachovia Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. AmmarCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API