Hiatt v. Parker
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Lyon District Cowrt. At the September Term, 1881, of the district court, defendants Parker and two others had judgment against plaintiff Hiatt, who brings the case to this court. The opinion states the nature of the action, and the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This was an action in the nature of a suit in equity, brought by Enos A. Hiatt against David M. Parker, Olive C. Parkei? and Alexander P. Martin, for the purpose of having certain instruments in writing set aside and canceled, and of reinvesting the plaintiff with the title to certain land which he had formerly owned; or, if that could not be done, then of having one of the instruments considered as a mortgage, and having the same foreclosed. The facts of the case as set forth in the plaintiff’s petition are briefly as follows: On January…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stewart v. BalderstonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
- Scarborough v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- Green v. DunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1869
3Cited by6 opinions
- Donovan v. McDevittMontana Supreme Court · 1907
- Baldwin v. McDonaldWyoming Supreme Court · 1916
- Hoffman v. Pacific Coast Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
- Hogueland v. ArtsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
- Fox, Canfield & Co. v. GravesNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.