Legal Opinion
In re the Personal Restraint of Spires
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided July 13, 2009No. 61883-1-IPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.
¶1 —At issue in this personal restraint petition of Stanford Spires is whether the legal financial obligations (LFOs) that the trial court imposed against him in June 1992 are still enforceable. Because the 10-year limitations period expired in December 2002, we hold that the LFOs are no longer enforceable. Accordingly, we grant the petition.
*239¶2 The relevant facts are undisputed. On June 26, 1992, the trial court sentenced Stanford Spires to three concurrent exceptional sentences of 13 months each for three counts of unlawful issuance of bank checks.1 According to the judgment and sentence,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re the Personal Restraint of CookWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. HenningsWashington Supreme Court · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Personal Restraint Petition Of Kim Robert DelavergneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019