Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Turnholt

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 12, 1925PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Vermilion, J. —

I. The claim of the plaintiffs, appellees, to the property in question is bottomed upon a chattel mortgage. One question in the case is whether the property taken under writ replevin was covered by the chattel mortgage. The facts ape not in serious dispute, question turns upon the construction of the chattel mortgage.

The mortgage was executed on May 18, 1920, and describes particularly certain specific live stock and personal property, including “2 Hampshire sows and 1 Chester White sow, 13 winter pigs, mixed Chester White and Hampshire, and 12 spring pigs, mixed Chester White…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lockwood v. Exchange BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Gregory Co. v. CaleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  3. In re BassU.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Georgia · 1877
  4. Thompson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  5. In re the Assignment of ThompsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kramer v. HofmannSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  2. Brown Et Ux. v. Cleverly Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Schwanz v. Farmers Co-Operative Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  4. Chambers v. First State Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  5. Bracewell v. HughesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API