Legal Opinion

Salvador v. Touro College

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 25, 2018No. 17-3161-cvUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

17‐3161‐cv Salvador v. Touro College, et al. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007 IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURTʹS LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION ʺSUMMARY ORDERʺ). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Cuoco v. MoritsuguCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  2. Fink v. Time Warner CableCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  3. Buechel v. BainNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Ronald Davidson v. Clement B. Capuano, David R. Harris and Joseph P. KeenanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  5. Watts v. Swiss Bank Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1970

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API