Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Moore v. Associated Producing & Refining Corp.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided July 18, 1923PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor:

The defendant does not oppose the issuance of a preliminary injunction in the language of the present restraining order. Such injunction will accordingly issue.

Objection is made, however, to the appointment of a receiver pendente lite. Before disposing of the application for such receiver, it is well to refer to the principles governing such an applications. The general rule has been well stated in two cases in this State. Gray, Atty. Gen., v. Newark, 9 Del. Ch. 171, 79 Atl. 735, 739; Ellis v. Penn. Beef Co., 9 Del. Ch. 213, 80 Atl. 666. In the former case it was said:

“While it…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ellis v. Penn Beef Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1911
  2. Gray v. Council of Newark & the Newark Water & Electric Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1911
  3. Whitmer v. William Whitmer & Sons, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1916
  4. Blades v. Billings Mercantile Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1911

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Salnita Corp. v. Walter Holding Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1933
  2. Dover Associates Joint Venture v. IngramCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2000
  3. Zuchowski v. Boxwood Coal Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1952
  4. Zuchowski v. Boxwood Coal Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1952
  5. BigHorn Ventures Nevada LLC v. Eric SolisCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API