Legal Opinion

Healy v. Foxcraft Philmont Division Gulf & Western Manufacturing Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 26, 1983No. 82-1048Published

1Per curiam

We affirm the judgment entered pursuant to a jury veirdict upon a holding that (1) the trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing deposition testimony of a critical witness to be read to the jury, see Colonnades, Inc. v. Vance Baldwin, Inc., 318 So.2d 515 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975), cert. denied, 330 So.2d 16 (Fla.1976); Fishman v. Liberty Associates, Inc., 196 So.2d 493 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967), writ discharged, 205 So.2d 657 (Fla.1968), and (2) the trial court properly permitted the defendants to use videotapes made by the plaintiff’s expert during the course of cross-examination of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fishman v. Liberty Associates, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  2. Colonnades, Inc. v. Vance Baldwin, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  3. Rayner v. Stauffer Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  4. Ferrell Jewelers of Tampa, Inc. v. Southern Mill Creek Products Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API