Legal Opinion

Marina Pacifica Homeowners Ass'n v. Southern California Financial Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 24, 2017No. B270580PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GRIMES, J.—

SUMMARY

Since January 1, 2008, Civil Code sections 1098 and 1098.5 have governed the circumstances under which certain fee payments, imposed when real property is transferred, may or may not be collected. In Marina Pacifica Homeowners Assn. v. Southern California Financial Corp. (2014) 232 Cal.App.4th 494 [181 Cal.Rptr.3d 271] (Marina Pacifica I), this court determined that a monthly “assignment fee,” payable by individual condominium unit owners to the developers of the condominium project, was properly collectible under those statutory provisions. The Supreme Court denied…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Snukal v. Flightways Manufacturing, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Marina Pacifica Homeowners Ass'n v. Southern California Financial Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2014

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Marina Pacifica Homeowners Ass'n v. S. Cal. Fin. Corp., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Marina Pacifica Homeowners Assn. v. Southern Cal. Financial Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API