Legal Opinion

Steven Albert Maher and Rebecca Maher, Husband and Wife v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 26, 1995No. 93-16398PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge SNEED; Dissent by Judge NORRIS.

SNEED, Circuit Judge:

This appeal presents a single question of law: Is a plaintiff who enters federal land to work a mining claim an invitee or a licensee under Arizona tort law? The district court held that the plaintiff in this case was a licensee. We affirm.

I

In August 1989, Steven Maher was injured on federal land in the Black Hills Rockhound *1041Area when an access road gave way underneath the backhoe he was driving, causing the vehicle to roll down an embankment. The road was among several thousand miles of dirt roads running through federal…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Markowitz v. Arizona Parks BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. United States v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  4. Nicoletti v. Westcor, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Leland J. Seyler and Aileene Seyler, Husband and Wife v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Patterson v. Thunder Pass, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. Inzunza v. Pima, County ofDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
  3. Steven Albert Maher and Rebecca Maher, Husband and Wife v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. Torres v. Jai DiningCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API