Legal Opinion

Preston v. City of Cedar Rapids

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 27, 1895PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Linn District Court. — Hon. J. D. Griffith, Judge. Action to recover damages to plaintiff’s property ■by reason of. the change of grade of the street upon which said property abuts. From a verdict and. judgment against the defendant, it appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtKinne, J.

I. In 1875 the defendant city passed an ordinance establishing a grade on First avenue. In 1877 or 1878 plaintiff'owned one twenty foot front lot on. said avenue, and his father was owner of the adjoining twenty-foot front, upon which they erected a three-story brick block, for commercial purposes, known as the “Preston Block.” The ordinance establishing the grade was passed prior to the erection of said block, and the building was erected in accordance with. said *73grade. In. 1887 plaintiff acquired title to the twenty feet formerly owned by his father. September 3,1886, defendant city passed…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McConnell v. City of OsageSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
  2. Cook v. C., B. & Q. R. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  3. Bays v. HerringSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
  4. Bays v. HuntSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  5. Brewster v. City of DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Markham v. City of AnamosaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  2. Arnold v. City of Fort DodgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  3. City of Rome v. ReeseCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  4. Shelby v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  5. Stritesky v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API