Legal Opinion

Wolford v. Lyon Gravel Gold Mining Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1883PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of El Dorado County granting a new trial. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMyrick, J.

The question involved in this case is of easy solution. The action was brought to recover damages for negligence on the part of defendant, by which, it is alleged, the husband of the plaintiff Ellen lost his life. It was admitted by the pleadings that the deceased had during their married life supported himself and his wife comfortably, solely by his labor, that by his death she was deprived of that support, and that he was sober and industrious. It was in evidence that the deceased was twenty-five years of age, with an expectation of thirty-six years longer, was careful and prudent, had been…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Beeson v. Green Mountain Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Hall v. The Bark "Emily Banning"California Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Cook v. Clay St. Hill R.R.California Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Asumendi v. FergusonIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Rigall v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Kalleg v. FassioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API