Legal Opinion
De Csepel v. Republic of Hungary
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 14, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2010-1261PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, United States District Judge
Defendants the Republic of Hungary, the Hungarian National Gallery, the Museum of Fine Arts, the Museum of Applied Arts, and the Budapest University of Technology and Economics have moved, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), to dismiss this case for want of subject matter jurisdiction. (Defendants’ Renewed Motion to Dismiss, May 18, 2015 [ECF No. 106] (“Defs.’ Ren. Mot.”).) It is defendants’ third motion to dismiss plain-, tiffs’ claim on jurisdictional grounds, but the first Rule 12(b)(1) motion filed and…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela v. Helmerich & Payne Int'l Drilling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
- David De Csepel v. Republic of HungaryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Alan Philipp v. Federal Republic of GermanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Philipp v. Federal Republic of GermanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Schermerhorn v. State of IsraelDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.