Legal Opinion · Dissent

Black Hills Trucking, Inc. v. North Dakota Industrial Commission

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 2017No. 20170086Published

1DissentCrothers, Justice

[¶ 37] I respectfully dissent.

[¶ 38] Black Hills Trucking (“BHT”) argues the North Dakota Industrial Commission (“NDIC”) lacks jurisdiction over the discharge of produced saltwater on a public road. The majority responds by discussing NDIC’s general authority over petroleum well-site operations and disposal of oilfield wastes, including saltwater. Majority opinion, ¶¶ 12-19. But they do not examine the actual grounds on which NDIC seeks to impose nearly $1 million in penalties.

[¶ 39] Examination of the particular statutes and regulations relied upon by NDIC as a basis for the complaint in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. United States v. The J. B. Williams Company, Inc., and Parkson Advertising Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  3. Schwind v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Egeland v. Continental Resources, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Wahl v. Morton County Social ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API