Legal Opinion

Liddell v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 19, 1961No. 13689PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, Chief Justice.

Appellants are Frank A. Liddell and the National Bank of Commerce of Houston. Appellees are T. M. Smith and the Humble Oil and Refining Company. The Humble Company is really a stakeholder but is an appellee because judgment went against it. in favor of T. M. Smith as to certain accrued royalties and thus against appeL ■lañts as to such 'royalties. This case originated ■ in a trespass-to-try title suit filed June 19, 1956, by appellants'in which they sought to establish ownership to one-fourth of the .one-eighth royalty created in a lease to the Humble Company insofar as it…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sanders v. HarderTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Benge v. ScharbauerTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Sun Oil Co. v. BennettTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  4. MacDonald v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  5. Texas Co. v. CainCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith v. LiddellTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  2. First National Indemnity Co. v. ConwayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API