Legal Opinion

In Re Arrigo

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado

Decided December 4, 2008No. 08-15852-MERPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MICHAEL E. ROMERO, Bankruptcy Judge.

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on confirmation of the Second Amended Chapter 13 Plan (the “Second Amended Plan”) filed by Thomas G. Arrigo and Joan B. Arrigo (the “Arrigos” or the “Debtors”), and the objection thereto filed by the Standing Chapter 13 Trustee (the “Trustee”). The Court has considered the evidence and legal arguments presented by the parties, and hereby makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law.

JURISDICTION

The Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334(a) and (b) and 157(a) and (b)(1).…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. In Re HardacreUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2006
  2. Gordon R. And Sharon L. Flygare, Debtors-Appellants v. Judith A. BouldenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  3. In Re AlexanderUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2006
  4. In Re JassUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2006
  5. Maney v. KagenveamaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re ToxvardUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2013
  2. Dehart v. Ponce (In Re Ponce)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. In re DeeseUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API