Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Frye

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 19, 1994No. C015620PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, J.

As amended in 1992, Government Code section 13967, subdivision (a) (hereafter § 13967(a)), provides in relevant part: “[I]f the person is convicted of one or more felony offenses, the court shall impose a . . . restitution fine of not less than two hundred dollars ($200), subject to the defendant’s ability to pay . . . .” (Italics added.)

Penal Code section 1202.4, subdivision (a) (hereafter § 1202.4(a)) provides in relevant part: “In any case in which a defendant is convicted of a felony, the court shall order the defendant to pay a restitution fine as provided in subdivision…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hutnick v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Pacific Southwest Realty Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. People v. StaleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. County of Yolo v. Los Rios Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. People v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Kaufman & Broad Communities, Inc. v. Performance Plastering, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. People v. HennesseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. People v. DouglasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. People v. GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. People v. MeniusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API