State v. State Board of Equalization
Montana Supreme Court
Original application for mandamus, by the State on the relation of the Attorney General, to compel the State Board ,of Equalization to make certain assessments of property of the Montana Power Company, the Great Falls Power Company, and other companies of the same nature, in accordance with the provisions-of section 1, Chapter 48, and section 6, Chapter 49, of the Laws of 1919. While it is true that ordinarily mandamus will not lie to control, direct or review the actions of…
Read the full summary
Original application for mandamus, by the State on the relation of the Attorney General, to compel the State Board ,of Equalization to make certain assessments of property of the Montana Power Company, the Great Falls Power Company, and other companies of the same nature, in accordance with the provisions-of section 1, Chapter 48, and section 6, Chapter 49, of the Laws of 1919. While it is true that ordinarily mandamus will not lie to control, direct or review the actions of assessing boards or officers, yet there are certain exceptions to this rule. One exception is where there is actual…
1Opinion
On the Merits.
(No. 4,478.)
Same — Electric Power Lines — State Board of Equalization — Duties—Statutes — Interpretation. 6. Held, that in enacting section 1, Chapter 48, Laws of 1919, the legislature intended that the state board of equalization should assess all eleetrie power and transmission lines constituting a single and continuous property operated in more than one county, and that lines located entirely within a single county should be assessed by the county assessor. Same — State Board of Equalization — Powers—Becords Import Verity. 7. The state board of equalization is a special…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BackusSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. BabcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BackusSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Missouri v. DockerySupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- State ex rel. Bee Building Co. v. SavageNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.