Legal Opinion

James Dean Walker v. A.L. Lockhart, Superintendent of the Arkansas Department of Corrections

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 10, 1985No. 81-1700 (Habeas)Published

1ConcurrenceArnold, Circuit Judge

Some of the arguments made in the dissenting opinion deserve, in my view, a brief comment.

1. The statement is made that “[t]he Court today frees James Dean Walker ____” Post, at 962. That is not at all what the Court is doing. We are simply holding that fundamental fairness, embodied in the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, requires a new trial. If Walker is ultimately freed, it will only be because he is acquitted by a jury, assuming that the state does not drop the matter on its own motion, which seems most unlikely.

2. I yield to no one in my conviction that the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API