Legal Opinion
King v. Riedl
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Decided August 6, 2010No. 2081172PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Judge.
This is an appeal of a summary judgment entered by the Madison Circuit Court concerning the application of § 34-14A-14, Ala.Code 1975. We affirm.
Facts and Procedural History
Roseann Riedl and Bryan A. Riedl (“the Riedls”) entered into a contract with Jim King d/b/a King Home Services (“King”) to make improvements to the Riedls’ house in Brownsboro. The improvements entailed work throughout the entire property, including work to the yard and demolition and installation work to the house. The Riedls paid King a total of $14,075 for some, but not all, of the work specified in the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Andrews v. Merritt Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Continental Eagle Corp. v. MokrzyckiSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Continental Nat. Indem. Co. v. FieldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
- Scott Bridge Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- AMER. GEN. LIFE AND ACC. INS. v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rape v. Poarch Band of Creek IndiansSupreme Court of Alabama · 2017