Legal Opinion

(PS) Jones v. Velocity Technology Solutions

District Court, E.D. California

Decided July 31, 2020No. 2:19-cv-02374Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GARRISON JONES, No. 2:19-cv-2374-KJM-EFB PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 VELOCITY TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS LLC; STEVE KLOEBLEN; 15 SUSAN HALTOPP; MICHAEL BALDWIN; SHANA COLEMAN; 16 VICKIE LEROUX; J.C. ODOM; CHAD CARLSON; and CHRIS HELLER, 17 Defendants. 18 19 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint and an application to proceed in forma 20 pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915.1 ECF No. 1 & 2. Prior to the court screening the complaint 21 (see 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)),…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. Turner v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  5. Hospital Building Co. v. Trustees of Rex HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API