Legal Opinion

United States v. Douglas James Farrell

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 16, 1971No. 25629PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Farrell was indicted and convicted in the distict court for violation of 50 U.S. C. App. § 462, refusing to submit to induction into the military service. On appeal, Farrell asserts numerous errors in his classification process. We affirm.

1. Refusal to Reopen to Consider C. O. Claim.

Farrell asserts that the local board’s refusal to reopen his I-A classification to consider his conscientious objector claim was improper and a denial of due process. Farrell did not assert a claim of conscientious objector status until after his induction order had been mailed. Thus, the board was without…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ehlert v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. David Victor Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  3. United States v. Alfred Loren WallaceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  4. United States v. Phillip Michael KannerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  5. United States v. Bruce Allen UhlCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Joseph Louis SowulCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  2. United States v. Daniel Warren HoffmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  3. United States v. BeaulieuDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1973
  4. United States v. MaloneDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API