Legal Opinion

State v. Gibbons

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 13, 1992No. 91-080PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The defendant, Frank Gibbons, appeals the refusal of the Superior Court (Groff, J.) to appoint counsel to assist him in petitioning for a suspended sentence. The sole issue presented on appeal is whether an indigent defendant, seeking a sentence suspension pursuant to RSA 651:20 (Supp. 1991), has a procedural due process right to the assistance of counsel under the fourteenth amendment to the Federal Constitution. The defendant does not invoke the State Constitution. We hold that procedural due process requirements do not apply to sentence suspension proceedings; hence, we affirm.

At the time…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Stapleford v. PerrinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  4. John Daley, D/B/A Abitronics v. Town of New Durham, N.H.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  5. State v. BurroughsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. VealeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  2. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  3. State v. HallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006
  4. State v. AlmodovarSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  5. State v. LeCouffeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API