Legal Opinion

Connell v. Connell

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1931PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFmtz, J.

By defendant’s notice under sec. 274.12, Stats., he requests a review of the question raised in the trial court by his demurrer challenging the propriety of the circuit court’s assuming jurisdiction to grant the relief sought by plaintiffs in this action. After an extended review of its decisions on that subject, this -court held in Cawker v. Dreutzer, 197 Wis. 98, 128, 221 N. W. 401, that—

“ . . . unless it is made to appear that the county court before which an estate is being administered cannot afford *548as adequate, complete, and efficient a remedy as the circuit court, the circuit court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cawker v. DreutzerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Watson v. City of AppletonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Flanagan v. the Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Armstrong v. GibsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  5. State ex rel. Town of Star Prairie v. Board of SupervisorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Milwaukee v. DrewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Hicks v. HardyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Razall v. RazallWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  4. West v. First Fond Du Lac Nat. BankDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1940
  5. Gardner v. FrantzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API