Mason ex rel. Marson v. Vasquez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The mandate is recalled. The en banc court having completed its duty pursuant to Death Penalty Rule 22^1(e)(3), the en banc court remands this cause to the- panel which had initial jurisdiction.
2DissentPregerson, Circuit Judge
Because I do not believe that the en banc panel completed its duties under Ninth Circuit Rules 22 — 2(b)(4) and 22-4(ej(2), I respectfully dissent. I also concur in Judge Noonan’s dissent.
I. PROCEDURE
Rule 22-2(b)(4) states that, upon a call for en banc review under Rule 22-4(e)(2),
the death penalty en bane court, selected, for that case, will review the decision of the special state death penalty…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Rees v. PeytonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brewer v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Ashirwad v. Charter Communications, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023
- David Edwin Mason, by and Through Charles C. Marson v. Daniel B. Vasquez, Warden of the California State Prison at San Quentin, David Edwin Mason, Randy Alana, Patrick Tafoya and Lee Terry Farmer, as Next Friends of David E. Mason, Applicants in Intervention-Appellants v. Daniel B. Vasquez, Warden of the California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Williams v. SmithDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022