Legal Opinion

Mason ex rel. Marson v. Vasquez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 6, 1993No. Nos. 93-99008, 93-99009PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The mandate is recalled. The en banc court having completed its duty pursuant to Death Penalty Rule 22^1(e)(3), the en banc court remands this cause to the- panel which had initial jurisdiction.

2DissentPregerson, Circuit Judge

Because I do not believe that the en banc panel completed its duties under Ninth Circuit Rules 22 — 2(b)(4) and 22-4(ej(2), I respectfully dissent. I also concur in Judge Noonan’s dissent.

I. PROCEDURE

Rule 22-2(b)(4) states that, upon a call for en banc review under Rule 22-4(e)(2),

the death penalty en bane court, selected, for that case, will review the decision of the special state death penalty…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Rees v. PeytonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Brewer v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ashirwad v. Charter Communications, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023
  2. David Edwin Mason, by and Through Charles C. Marson v. Daniel B. Vasquez, Warden of the California State Prison at San Quentin, David Edwin Mason, Randy Alana, Patrick Tafoya and Lee Terry Farmer, as Next Friends of David E. Mason, Applicants in Intervention-Appellants v. Daniel B. Vasquez, Warden of the California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  3. Williams v. SmithDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API