Gimble, Florshime & Co. v. Ferguson
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Page District Court. In an action by attachment brought by plaintiffs herein against A. W. Barlow, the appellee, W. P. Ferguson, was .garnished, and upon his answer was discharged. Plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.
I. The undisputed facts upon which the decision of the case turns as shown by the answer of the garnishee — and there was no other evidence — are as follows: The defendant, A. W. Barlow, executed to J. Barlow a chattel mortgage upon a stock of merchandise, to secure an indebtedness from the mortgagor to the mortgagee. Under this instrument the mortgagee took possession of the goods, and soon after the attachment in this action was levied upon the same property, subjeót to the rights of the mortgagee, and the appellee was served with garnishment process. Prior to the issuing of the attachment…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Roberts v. Austin Corbin & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1868
- Doane & Co. v. GarretsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
3Cited by5 opinions
- Goldsmith v. WillsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
- Kuhnes v. CahillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Union Mercantile Co. v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
- Phelps v. Winters & HillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
- Simon v. OpenheimerU.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Iowa · 1884