Legal Opinion
Stuart v. Anheuser-Busch Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided April 4, 1966No. 2152PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YARRUT, Judge.
This is a suit for workmen’s compensation. Plaintiff was employed as a freight handler by the Defendant, Anheuser-Busch Company, and was injured while unloading a boxcar for his employer on the tracks of the Illinois Central Railroad. The Railroad was made a third-party Defendant on the allegation that Plaintiff’s injury was due to the unsafe condition of its freight car.
The Railroad was dismissed as third-party Defendant by the district court, and all parties agree that the Railroad was not guilty of any negligence because the freight car was delivered to it loaded and sealed,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Guillory v. New Amsterdam Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
- Hebert v. Your Food Processing & Warehouse, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1965
- Bankston v. Aetna Casualty Co. of Hartford, Conn.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
- Matherne v. Wheless Drilling Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- Page v. Home Indemnity Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wood v. Citizens Standard Life Insurance CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1971
- Lege v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
- Dobard v. R. Theriot Liquor Stores Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- Stuart v. Anheuser-Busch Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1966