Legal Opinion

United States v. Copeland

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided September 30, 1982No. ACM S25631PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

2Per curiam

Senior Airman Copeland was convicted at a bench trial of larceny, forgery, and making a false official statement, violations of Articles 121,123, and 107, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 921, 923, and 907. He was sentenced to a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for four months, forfeitures of $250.00 per month for four months, and reduction to airman basic.

On appeal, he urges that the military judge erred by overruling a defense motion that the forgery and larceny specifications should be considered multiplicious for sentencing purposes. See generally,…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. BrowndUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  2. Trotman v. HaebelUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  3. United States v. VasquezU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1980
  4. United States v. WilsonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1976
  5. Stokes v. United StatesU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. WhiteU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API