Legal Opinion
Barbe v. American Sugar Refining, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 14, 2011No. 2011-CA-0544PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MICHAEL E. KIRBY, Judge.
| ¶ Defendant, American Sugar Refining, Inc. (f/k/a Domino Sugar Corporation, f/k/a Tate & Lyle North American Sugars, Inc., f/k/a Amstar Corporation, f/k/a Amstar Sugar Corporation), appeals the trial court judgment in favor of plaintiffs, Leico Anthony Assevedo, John Hayward, Jack Oal-mann, Tommy Smith and Edgar Wood-ridge. For reasons that follow, we affirm.
Plaintiffs, all former long-time employees of the defendant, filed suit against the defendant for damages for hearing loss allegedly caused by long-term exposure to hazardous industrial noise at the defendant’s…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Roberts v. BenoitSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
- Smith v. Louisiana Dept. of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Campo v. CorreaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ames v. OhleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- Arrant v. Graphic Packaging International, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2015
- M.R. Pittman Group, L.L.C. v. Plaquemines Parish GovernmentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Arrant v. Graphic Packaging International, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- Bayou Construction Group, LLC v. City of New Orleans, Tktmj, Incorporated, Cp Grace & Associates, Incorporated, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, Jane Doe, John Doe, Jane Smith & John SmithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.