Legal Opinion

Allen v. Allen

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 26, 2002No. B143248PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NOTT, J.

The question raised by this appeal is whether a wife’s consent to the use of community funds to improve her husband’s separate real property raises a presumption that the funds were a gift of the funds to the husband. We conclude that it does not. In so holding, we agree with In re Marriage of Wolfe (2001) 91 Cal.App.4th 962 [110 Cal.Rptr.2d 921] (Wolfe), which recently held that where a wife uses community funds to make improvements to her husband’s separate property, the community is entitled to reimbursement of the funds.

Contentions

Judith Lorraine Allen appeals from a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Estate of NeilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Estate of MacDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. In Re Marriage of MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. In Re Marriage of MarsdenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Dunn v. MullanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sherman v. ShermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. Nicholson v. SparksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Marriage of MohlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API