Legal Opinion

Sanford v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 23, 1994No. 90-582CPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge.

This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss under RCFC 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(4), and plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the court grants the defendant’s motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(4). Oral argument is deemed unnecessary in the instant case.

FACTS

Plaintiff, Jack Sanford, served as an active duty United States Air Force (USAF) officer *364from May 9, 1961 to July 26, 1967. After receiving an honorable discharge from service in July 1967, Sanford began serving as a reserve officer in the United States Air…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hoskins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  2. Osborn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  3. Hernandez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  4. French v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  5. Reeves v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API