Legal Opinion
Van Deelen v. City of Eudora, Kan.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided June 29, 1999No. 96-4040-SACPublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CROW, Senior District Judge.
This 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights case comes before the court on the defendant Frank Diehl’s motion to dismiss complaint (Dk.180). Though this motion has been fully briefed for some time, the court’s docket has kept it from rendering a timely decision. The court apologizes for this unavoidable delay.
The plaintiff appearing pro se has sued Frank Diehl in his individual capacity 1 for actions taken while he was a prosecuting attorney in the District Attorney’s office in Douglas County, Kansas. In his second amended complaint, the plaintiff…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Ewing v. City of StocktonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- McCormick v. Board of Shawnee County Comm'rsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
- Marrie v. NickelsDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1999
- Fugate v. Unified Government of Wyandotte County/Kansas CityDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2001
- Huffmier v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2002
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.