Legal Opinion
Hart v. Dewey
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided June 6, 1936No. File #53324PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtCornell, J.
The demurrer is adressed to the “complaint”. A substituted complaint differing in but one material particular from the original, was filed on April 2, 1936. Since the demurrer was filed on April 14, 1936, it is assumed that it is the substituted complaint at which it is levelled.
The plaintiff obtained a judgment against one Falk who as a deputy sheriff, it is alleged, (and admitted for the purpose of the demurrer) has been found to have been guilty of certain neglects of duty in serving and returning process delivered to him by plaintiff’s attorney in an action against other parties whereby…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Byram Lumber & Supply Co. v. PageSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- New Britain Lumber Co. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Schunack v. Art Metal Novelty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
- Van Zandt Jacobs & Co. v. SteiberSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Robertson & Govanne Contracting Co. v. Aetna Accident & Liability Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
3Cited by1 opinion
- Baumann v. Darhogopian, No. Cv 90 0267203 S (May 20, 1991)Connecticut Superior Court · 1991