Legal Opinion

Beatty v. Gardner

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 29, 2025No. 4:23-cv-00364Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KYLE BEATTY, : CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:23-CV-364 : Plaintiff : (Judge Neary) : v. : : CLINTON GARDNER and CALVIN : IRVIN, : : Defendants : MEMORANDUM Law enforcement officers have two key responsibilities. The first is to protect and defend the communities they serve from those who are alleged to have offended the law. And the second is to respect the legal protections afforded to these alleged offenders while the officers engage in their law enforcement duties. This case concerns the latter responsibility. Plaintiff Kyle…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API