Legal Opinion

Hatfield v. Lamb

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1936No. 8272PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hatcher, President:

The director of an insolvent bank seeks priority for a claim against the bank by virtue of a transaction between him and the bank’s president, shortly before the bank closed. The circuit court sustained the director, and the receiver of the bank appealed.

The facts are not in dispute. The plaintiff, Robert P. Hatfield, was elected a director of Huntington Banking & Trust Company in January, 1932, and remained a director continuously until the bank was officially closed on April 7, 1933. Its insolvency at the latter date is conceded. At the January, 1932 meeting of the board…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Arnold v. KnappWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Benedum v. First Citizens BankWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Lamb v. PannellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Wolfe v. Second National Bank of ParkersburgWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Ream's Drug Store v. Bank of the Monongahela ValleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Davis v. WoolfCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1945
  2. Beall v. Morgantown & Kingwood RailroadWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Sutherland v. HonakerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Commercial Banking & Trust Co. v. Doddridge County BankWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. United States Stamping Co. v. GallWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API