State v. Savaria
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBaker, C.J.
Steven Savaria appeals his convictions for felony harassment and intimidating a witness. The State concedes error regarding the conviction for felony harassment because the jury was not instructed to find all of the elements nécessary to elevate harassment to a felony. We reverse both convictions because the trial court’s denial of Savaria’s motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence was an abuse of discretion. We also discuss those other issues raised by Savaria which are likely to recur on retrial.
FACTS
Savaria and the alleged victim (Karelson) had a stormy relationship. As a…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. PirtleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- United States v. Daniel P. Taglia and Robert J. McDonnellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- State v. GoreWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. C.G.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. RocheCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- State v. RocheCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- State v. GillCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- State v. GillCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.