Legal Opinion

Palladeno v. Mohr

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided May 6, 2020No. 3:18-cv-01352Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Ted Palladeno, et al., Case No. 3:18-cv-1352 Plaintiffs, v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Gary Mohr, et al., Defendants. I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND Plaintiff Ted Palladeno, an inmate in the custody of the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (“ODRC”), initiated this litigation pro se in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. My colleague, U.S. District Judge Michael H. Watson, denied Palladeno’s motions to certify the case as a class action and for a preliminary…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API