Legal Opinion

W. G. Ross Son v. Hawthorne

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 15, 1923No. 918PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

A defendant charged by the plaintiff with converting mortgaged property upon which he is asserting a chattel mortgage lien is not a necessary party to his action of foreclosure against the mortgagor. Boydston v. Morris, 71 Tex. 697, 10 S. W. 331. The plea of privilege of one so charged should be sustained and the cause, in so far as it affects him, transferred to the county of his residence, when he is joined as a party defendant with the mortgagor in a suit for debt and foreclosure, unless it is made to appear that the tort was committed in the county where plaintiff has laid his venue.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Behrens Drug Co. v. Hamilton & McCartyTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Boydston v. MorrisTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. First Nat. Bank of Coleman v. GatesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. Russell v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. Sublett v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harris v. GregoryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  2. First State Bank of Crowell v. HillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API