Clarage Fan Co. v. B. F. Sturtevant Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FUCKS, Circuit Judge.
Suit by B. F. Sturtevant Company (herein called Sturtevant or appellee) against Clarage Fan Company (herein called Clarage or appellant) for infringement of patent No. 1,846,863 (herein called No. 863), for “Fan and Method of Operating the same” issued to Hagen, February 23, 1932, and for infringement of patent No. 1,989,413 (herein called No. 413) issued to Hagen, January 29, 1935, for a “Centrifugal Fan.”
In an amended complaint Sturtevant based its suit on claim 2 of No. 863 and the four claims of No. 413 and sought to hold Clarage bound from contesting these claims…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- United Shoe MacHinery Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Reo Motor Car Co. v. Gear Grinding MacH. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
- David Bradley Manuf'g Co. v. Eagle Manuf'g Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1893
- B. F. Sturtevant Co. v. Massachusetts Hair & Felt Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Vulcan, Inc. v. Fordees CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Abbott v. Barrentine Manufacturing CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1966
- Loretta E. Rogoski v. City of MuskegonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
- Vulcan, Inc. v. Fordees Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1978
- Rehrig Controls Co. v. Maxitrol Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.