Vulcan, Inc. v. Fordees Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Circuit Judge.
Fordees Corporation appeals from a judgment of patent validity and infringement. The issues before us concern the res judicata effect of a prior consent decree and the doctrine of equivalents. Specifically, Fordees argues: 1) that it was not in privity with the prior defendant and is therefore not bound by the determination of patent validity in the consent decree; and 2) that devices it built after entry of the decree do not infringe the patent.
*1108The patent in dispute is the “Titzel” patent, granted to Titzel Engineering, Inc. on January 19, 1965.1 The…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- The Aro Corporation v. Allied Witan CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- I. T. S. Rubber Co. v. Essex Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Whitacre Partnership v. Biosignia, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- Usm Corporation v. Sps Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- National Labor Relations Board v. Donna-Lee Sportswear Co., Inc., International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, Afl-Cio, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Donovan v. Estate of FitzsimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Gilbraith v. HixsonOhio Supreme Court · 1987
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.