Legal Opinion

Vulcan, Inc. v. Fordees Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 14, 1981No. 78-3325PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Circuit Judge.

Fordees Corporation appeals from a judgment of patent validity and infringement. The issues before us concern the res judicata effect of a prior consent decree and the doctrine of equivalents. Specifically, Fordees argues: 1) that it was not in privity with the prior defendant and is therefore not bound by the determination of patent validity in the consent decree; and 2) that devices it built after entry of the decree do not infringe the patent.

*1108The patent in dispute is the “Titzel” patent, granted to Titzel Engineering, Inc. on January 19, 1965.1 The…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. The Aro Corporation v. Allied Witan CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
  5. I. T. S. Rubber Co. v. Essex Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Whitacre Partnership v. Biosignia, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Usm Corporation v. Sps Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Donna-Lee Sportswear Co., Inc., International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, Afl-Cio, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  4. Donovan v. Estate of FitzsimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  5. Gilbraith v. HixsonOhio Supreme Court · 1987

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API