Mary Ellen C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FIDEL, Judge.
¶ 1 It is well established that the State, before acting to terminate parental rights, has an affirmative duty to make all reasonable efforts to preserve the family relationship. See Maricopa County Juv. Action No. JS-6520, 157 Ariz. 238, 241, 756 P.2d 335, 338 (App.1988); see also Maricopa County Juv. Action No. JA 33794, 171 Ariz. 90, 91-92, 828 P.2d 1231,1232-33 (App.1991). The case law has been inconsistent, however, in establishing whether this affirmative duty entails an obligation to make a reasonable effort to rehabilitate a parent who suffers from a disabling…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-500274Arizona Supreme Court · 1990
- In the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JS-5209 & No. JS-4963Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Arizona State Department of Economic Security v. MahoneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. JA 33794Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- Mary Lou C. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Jordan C. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Raymond F. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- Shawanee S. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Jennifer G. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.