Midura v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Benham, Judge.
Appellants Julie and Henry Midura (Ed) were convicted of possession of marijuana with intent to distribute. In the second portion of a bifurcated trial, Ed Midura was convicted of the possession of firearms by a convicted felon. On appeal, appellants take issue with the sufficiency of the evidence, the denial of their motion to suppress, and the effectiveness of trial counsel.
1. The State presented evidence that approximately 2~1/2 pounds of marijuana were seized during a search of appellants’ home. An assortment of drug paraphernalia and a triple beam scale were also found. The…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chancey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
- Hambrick v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
- State v. LuckSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- Lewis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Victrum v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- State v. WessonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Sawyer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.