Legal Opinion

Ludwig v. William K. Warren Foundation

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 2, 1991No. 68075PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARGRAVE, Chief Justice:

Plaintiffs, Albert and Emma Ludwig, brough an action in the District Court of Kingfisher County to quiet title to an undivided one-half interest in the minerals under the East half of the Southeast quarter of Section 35, Township 19 North, Range 6 West, Kingifsher County, Oklahoma. Plaintiffs claimed that a defeasible term mineral interest had expired when production from the original well had ceased. The district court quieted title in the plaintiffs against the defendants, Tenneco Oil Company, Barter Island Oil Company and The William K. Warren Foundation. This…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Stewart v. Amerada Hess Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  2. Oklahoma City v. Local Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  3. Beatty v. BaxterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  4. Kassner v. Alexander Drug Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  5. Frensley v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pack v. Santa Fe MineralsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  2. Whig Syndicate, Inc. v. KeyesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  3. Rox Petroleum, L.L.C. v. New Dominion, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  4. Greenfield v. ThillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. RLM Petroleum Corp. v. EmmerichSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API