Legal Opinion

Marriage of Kelzenberg v. Kelzenberg

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 14, 1984No. C7-84-392PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Appellant alleges the trial court erred in forgiving $147.00 of child support arrear-ages and reducing child support by $49.00 per month. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant, Jean Mary Kelzenberg, and respondent, Bruce Joseph Kelzenberg, were married in November of 1978 and divorced in January of 1983. They have one child who resides with the appellant. At the dissolution trial appellant and respondent stipulated that they were employed at the United States Postal Service and respectively earned a net income of $1,343 and $1,355 per month. Respondent also indicated he received an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Solon v. SolonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Farnum v. Committee on Character & FitnessSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. In Re the Welfare of K.T.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Marriage of Bledsoe v. BledsoeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rosenberg v. Townsend, Rosenberg & Young, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Giencke v. HaglundCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Giencke v. HaglundCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API