Legal Opinion

Ford Motor Co. v. Rushford

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 11, 2006No. 20A03-0506-CV-293PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHARPNACK, Judge.

Ford Motor Company ("Ford") and Eby Ford Lincoln Mereury a/k/a Eby Ford Sales, Inc. ("Eby") appeal the trial court's denial of their collective motion for summary judgment. Ford and Eby raise three issues, which we consolidate and restate as whether the trial court erred by denying their motion for summary judgment. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

The relevant facts designated by the parties follow. In early May 2002, Marilyn Rushford ("Rushford") and her husband, Charles Rushford ("Charles"), bought a new 2002 Ford Focus from Eby. The vehicle contained…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mangold Ex Rel. Mangold v. Indiana Department of Natural ResourcesIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Rhodes v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v. SharpIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. PSI Energy, Inc. v. Home Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Federal Kemper Insurance v. BrownIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. RushfordIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Methodist Hospitals, Inc. v. JohnsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API