Legal Opinion

Atkins v. Steed

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 22, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

Tbe plaintiff bas sued for two injuries, not,one. He declares on different causes of action against different parties. He incorporates these in tbe same complaint. Tbe pleading is bad as against a demurrer. Lucas v. Bank, 206 N. C., 909, 174 S. E., 301; Grady v. Warren, 201 N. C., 693, 161 S. E., 319; Shuford v. Yarbrough, 198 N. C., 5, 150 S. E., 618; Bank v. Angelo, 193 N. C., 576, 137 S. E., 705; Rose v. Warehouse Co., 182 N. C., 107, 108 S. E., 389; Roberts v. Mfg. Co., 181 N. C., 204, 106 S. E., 664.

Where dual misjoinders occur of both parties and causes of action, and a demurrer is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Citizens National Bank v. Angelo Bros.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Roberts v. Utility Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. Rose v. Fremont Warehouse & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  4. Lucas v. North Carolina Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. Grady v. . WarrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Barber v. WootenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Johnson v. ScarboroughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. GULF LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. WatersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Barber v. WootenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API